Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 4 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Timothy Kane |
| 17 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - erwin van der veken |
| 28 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kim Vanderlinden |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 28 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kim Vanderlinden |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 22 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - erwin van der veken |
| 27 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Timothy Kane |
| 3 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kim Vanderlinden |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Sep 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-6-375 |
You can find further information about peer review here.