Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Herman Wunderink |
20 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Branka Nikolic |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
30 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Chenchit Chayachinda |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
30 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
24 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Chenchit Chayachinda |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
24 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
24 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Chenchit Chayachinda |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
24 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
16 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Chenchit Chayachinda |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
16 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
27 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Chenchit Chayachinda |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
27 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
29 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
2 Oct 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-6-330 |
You can find further information about peer review here.