Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Journal of Medical Case Reports and BioMed Central.

Open Access Case report

Spontaneus bilateral pedicle fracture 30 years after Harrington Instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: a case report

Peter Obid*, Alexander Richter, Hüseyin Übeyli and Thomas Niemeyer

Author Affiliations

Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Abt. für Wirbelsäulen- und Skoliosechirurgie, Lohmühlenstraße 5, 20099 Hamburg, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Medical Case Reports 2012, 6:29  doi:10.1186/1752-1947-6-29

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jmedicalcasereports.com/content/6/1/29


Received:30 May 2011
Accepted:23 January 2012
Published:23 January 2012

© 2012 Obid et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Introduction

Spontaneous fractures of the spine are a common entity. They usually occur in older people with osteoporosis. This case is presented on account of its rarity. To the best of the authors' knowledge only one case of an osteoporotic pedicle fracture after Harrington Instrumentation has been described before.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 46-year-old Caucasian woman who underwent surgery due to idiopathic scoliosis with a Harrington Instrumentation (T4 to L3) 30 years ago. During the operation she was infected with hepatitis C while receiving erythrocyte concentrates and has suffered from liver cirrhosis since then. She presented with a sudden pain in her lower back and paraesthesia in both her legs but no other neurological symptoms. A computed tomography scan showed a bilateral pedicle fracture of L3 and an additional compression fracture of L4. In the first session we performed a dorsal stabilization with massive intraoperative bleeding and a postoperative failure of liver synthesis. In a second session an additional ventral augmentation was done. After the second operation she developed a hepatorenal syndrome. Both operations left the patient in a very critical state which led to a prolonged stay in the intensive care and rehabilitation unit. At her 12-month follow-up visit, she was free of complaints.

Conclusion

The un-physiological load of the spine after Harrington Instrumentation can lead to osteoporosis due to inactivity even in younger patients. Although these implants are not used anymore one should keep this possibility in mind when dealing with patients who have received Harrington rods in surgical procedures.

Introduction

The Harrington rods were the first implants which were successfully used for the surgical correction of scoliosis [1]. Until pedicle screws were available the Harrington rods had been the gold standard in scoliosis surgery but they were not able to correct the sagittal profile or the vertebral rotation. With the pedicle-screw systems used today a three-dimensional correction of the deformity is possible [2]. However, some problems remain. Every instrumentation of the spine leads to decreased volumetric densitiy of the bone which makes further degeneration more likely [3]. In this case the patient's advanced liver cirrhosis led to an additional hepatic osteopenia [4,5]. Choudhary et al. showed that patients with liver cirrhosis have a higher risk of developing an osteodystrophy [6]. We present the case of a 46-year-old woman with a Harrington instrumentation and liver cirrhosis who incurred a spinal fracture without a trauma.

Case presentation

A 46-year-old Caucasian woman underwent surgery with a Harrington intrumentation (T4-L3) due to idiopathic scoliosis 30 years ago. During the operation she received a blood transfusion and was infected with hepatits C. Today she has cirrhosis with liver failure (Child-Pugh classification C). Without any trauma she felt a sudden pain in her lower back with paraesthesis in both her legs but no other neurological symptoms. A computed tomography (CT) scan (Figure 1) and X-ray (Figures 2, 3) showed a bilateral pedicle fracture of L3. We first performed a dorsal instrumentation L1-5 and a posterolateral spondylodesis. She had massive intraoperative bleeding and a very bad quality of the bone. Due to the bad quality of the bone we were not able to place the pedicle screws in L1 bilaterally. She needed a perioperative mass transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), PPSB and erythrocyte concentrates which is why we were not able to perform a ventral augmentation in one session as originally planed. Postoperatively the liver function decompensated and the patient needed to stay in the intensive care unit for ten days and had a notably extended rehabilitation. Although she was carefully mobilized with a corset she developed a progressive thoracolumbar kyphosis with a looming cutting-out of the pedicle screw in L1 (Figures 4, 5). We needed to perform an additional ventral augmentation T11-L3 with the same problems that occurred during the first operation with another mass transfusion of blood products. After the second operation the patient developed a hepatorenal syndrome and needed to stay in the intensive care unit for 28 days and another month in the rehabilitation unit. In summary, both operations required a long postoperative stay in the intensive care unit and led to a decompensation of her liver function. After rehabilitation, at her 12-month follow up, she is free of complaints and her X-ray shows no further loss of correction (Figures 6, 7).

thumbnailFigure 1. A computed tomography scan shows the fractured pedicles of L3

thumbnailFigure 2. X-ray of the lumbar spine in anterior-posterior projection

thumbnailFigure 3. X-ray of the lumbar spine in lateral projection showing the fractured pedicle

thumbnailFigure 4. X-ray of the spine in anterior-ppsterior projection after dorsal spondylodesis

thumbnailFigure 5. X-ray of the spine in lateral projection after dorsal spondylodesis showing the progressive thoracolumbar kyphosis and looming cutting-out of the pedicle screw in L1

thumbnailFigure 6. X-ray of the spine in anterior-posterior projection one year after additional ventral augmentation

thumbnailFigure 7. X-ray of the spine in lateral projection one year after additional ventral augmentation showing no further loss of correction

Discussion

Spontaneous fractures of the spine occur due to previous damage, be it from osteoporosis, any other systemic pathology affecting the spine or be it iatrogenic. Cyron et al. showed that the pedicle is the second weakest point in the neural arch after the pars interarticularis [7,8]. The pedicle remains less likely to fracture because of its shorter moment arm [9]. However, few cases of bilateral pedicle stress fractures have been reported [10-15]. Kim et al. described a bilateral pedicle fracture of L4 in a patient with a four-year history of ankylosing spondylitis [10]. Two cases have been reported in which no other pre-existing causative factors than osteoporosis have been found [11,12]. Tribus et al. described the case of a patient treated with posterior spinal fusion with segmental instrumentation from T3 to L4 who developed fractures of L4 pedicles [16]. Knight et al. described a fractured pedicle within the fusion mass after Harrington Instrumentation [17]. Due to the fact that these cases seldom occur, the therapy varies from conservative treatment over percutaneous instrumentation of the affected pedicles to dorsal instrumentation and spondylodesis with or without the neighboring segments. In our patient the situation was highly unstable. Even after dorsal instrumentation the patient developed a progressive kyphosis which made an additional ventral spondylodesis necessary.

Conclusion

Bilateral pedicle fractures in the spine are very uncommon. Few cases have been reported. Many patients who underwent surgery with a Harrington Instrumentation as a child or teenager are, or will be, in an age where osteoporosis becomes an issue. Although in the case of our patient her severe liver cirrhosis made surgery even more difficult, spinal surgeons should be aware of the management of these kinds of complications. Regarding the serious complications one could retrospectively think of a less invasive surgery but to prevent further loss of correction and achieve a good long-term result some kind of bony spondylodesis is needed. This can only be achieved with open surgery which is why we would recommend a dorso-ventral procedure.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

PO wrote the case report. AR and HÜ made substantial contributions to its conception and design. TN has given final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Mariconda M, Galasso O, Barca P, Milano C: Minimum 20-year follow-up results of Harrington rod fusion for idiopathic scoliosis.

    Eur Spine J 2005, 14:854-861. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Halm H, Richter A, Thomsen B, Köszegvary M, Ahrens M, Quante M: Anterior scoliosis surgery. State of the art and a comparison with posterior techniques.

    Orthopäde 2009, 38:131-134, 136-140, 142-145. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  3. McAfee PC, Farey ID, Sutterlin CE, Gurr KR, Warden KE, Cunningham BW: Device-related osteoporosis with spinal instrumentation.

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989, 14:919-926. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Gundling F, Seidl H, Löffler N, Strassen I, Schepp W: Metabolic disturbances in liver cirrhosis (part 1)--hepatic osteopathy and malnutrition.

    Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2009, 134:2461-2464. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Wibaux C, Legroux-Gerot I, Dharancy S, Boleslwaski E, Declerck N, Canva V, Mathurin P, Pruvot FR, Cortet B: Assesing bone status in patients awaiting liver transplantation.

    Joint Bone Spine 2011, 78:367-391. OpenURL

  6. Choudhary NS, Tomar M, Chawla YK, Bhadada SK, Khandelwal N, Dhiman RK, Duseja A, Bhansali A: Hepatic osteodystrophy is common in patients with noncholestatic liver disease.

    Dig Dis Sci 2011, 56:3323-3327. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Cyron BM, Hutton WC: The fatigue strength of the lumbar neural arch in spondylolysis.

    J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1978, 60:234-238. OpenURL

  8. Cyron BM, Hutton WC, Troup JDG: Spondylolytic fractures.

    J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1976, 58:462-466. OpenURL

  9. Robertson PA, Grobler LJ: Stress fracture of the pedicle: A late complication of posterolateral lumbar fusion.

    Spine 1993, 18:930-932. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Kim HS, Ju CI, Kim SW: Bilateral pedicle stress fracture accompanying spondylolysis in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis.

    J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010, 48:70-72. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  11. Johnson JN, Wang MY: Stress fracture of the lumbar pedicle bilaterally: surgical repair using a percutaneous minimally invasive technique.

    J Neurosurg Spine 2009, 11:724-728. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Doita M, Ando Y, Hirata S, Ishikawa H, Kurosaka M: Bilateral pedicle stress fracture in a patient with osteoporotic compression fracture.

    Eur Spine J 2009, 18(Suppl 2):206-209. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  13. Doita M, Shimomura T, Nishida K, Maeno K, Fujioka H, Kurosaka M: Bilateral pedicle stress fracture in a patient with lumbar spinal stenosis: a case report.

    J Spinal Disord Tech 2008, 21:531-534. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Hajjioui A, Khazzani H, Sbihi S, Bahiri R, Benchekroune B, Hajjaj-Hassouni N: Spondylolisthesis on bilateral pedicle stress fracture in the lumbar spine: A case study.

    Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2011, 54:53-58. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Maurer SG, Wright KE, Bendo JA: Iatrogenic spondylolysis leading to contralateral pedicular stress fracture and unstable spondylolisthesis: a case report.

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000, 25:895-898. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Tribus CB, Bradford DS: Bilateral pedicular stress fractures after successful posterior spinal fusion for adult idiopathic scoliosis.

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993, 18:1222-1225. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Knight RQ, Chan DP: Idiopathic scoliosis with unusual stress fracture of the pedicle within solid fusion mass. A case report.

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992, 17:849-851. Publisher Full Text OpenURL