Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paraskevi Maggina |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven Lippmann |
3 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jiawei Wang |
3 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Paraskevi Maggina |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
13 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven Lippmann |
13 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jiawei Wang |
26 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Paraskevi Maggina |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
26 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
18 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Paraskevi Maggina |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
18 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
25 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Paraskevi Maggina |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
25 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
1 May 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Jul 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-6-224 |
You can find further information about peer review here.