Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Laurie Conklin |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Laurie Conklin |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 26 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harpreet Pall |
| 26 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michele Bishop |
| 18 Dec 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andres Gelrud |
| 9 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Laurie Conklin |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| 1 May 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Laurie Conklin |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 1 May 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 May 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 May 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-2-176 |
You can find further information about peer review here.